Representation Theory

Arun Ram
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
aram@unimelb.edu.au

Last updated: 2 October 2014

Lecture 4

The Iwahori-Hecke algebra Hk(q) has generators Ti= i i+1 , 1≤i≤k+1, and relations TiTi+1Ti= Ti+1TiTi+1 andTi-Ti-1 =(q-q-1). If q=1 then Hk(q) is ℂSk, where Sk is the symmetric group. If yεi∨= then yεi∨ yεj∨= yεj∨ yεi∨ and yε1∨⋯ yεn∨= Tw02∈ 𝒵(Hk(q)), where 𝒵(Hk(q)) is the center of Hk(q).

We want to study the tower H1⊆H2⊆H3⊆⋯, where Hk-1 ↪ Hk b ⟼ b using ResHk-1Hk and IndHk-1Hk.

A partition is a collection of boxes in a corner λ= =(6,6,4,1,1).

Let Hˆk= {partitions with k boxes}. The Bratelli diagram of the tower H1⊆H2⊆⋯ has λ∈Hˆk as vertices on level k λ-μ if μ is obtained by adding a box to λ. ∅ This means {Irreducible Hk-modules} ⟷1-1Hˆk and ResHk-1Hk (Hkλ)= ∑μ≤λλ/μ=▫ Hk-1μ. Since HomHk (IndHk-1Hk(Hk-1μ),Hkλ)= HomHk-1 (Hk-1μ,ResHk-1Hk(Hkλ)) and HomHk (Hkλ,Hkν)= { 0, if λ≠ν, ℂ·Id, if λ-ν, we get IndHk-1Hk (Hk-1μ)= ⨁λ⊇μλ/μ=▫ Hkλ. Note that dim(Hkλ)= # of paths from ∅–⋯–λ

As vector spaces H4 = H3 ⊕ H3 = H2 ⊕ H2 ⊕ H = H1 ⊕ H1 ⊕ H1 . (H1≃M1(ℂ) which has one 1-dimensional simple module.)

A standard tableau of shape λ is a filling T of the boxes of λ with 1,2,…,k such that

(a) the rows increase left to right,
(b) the columns increase top to bottom.
There is a bijection {standard tableaux of shape λ} ⟷1-1 {paths ∅–⋯–λ} 1 3 2 4 5 ↤ ∅ – ⟶ ⟶ ⟶ ⟶ so that dim(Hkλ)= # of standard tableaux of shape λ.

The irreducible Hk(q)-modules are Hkλ=span {vT | T a standard tealux of shape λ} with Hk-action given by yεi∨vT = qc(T(i)) vT, TivT = q-q-1 1-q2(c(T(i)))-c(T(i+1)) vT+ ( q-1 q-q-1 1-q2(c(T(i)))-c(T(i+1)) vsiT ) where T(i) = box containing i in T, c(b) = s-r,if b is in row  r, column s, siT is T with i and i+1  switched, vsiT = 0if siT is not standard.

H5 has basis v1 23 45 5, v1 23 54 5, v1 32 45 5, v1 32 54 5, v1 42 53 5 and T2 v1 23 54 5 = q-q-11-q2(1-(-1)) v1 23 54 5+ (q-1+q-q-11-q2(1-(-1))) v1 32 54 5 T2 v1 42 53 5 = q-q-11-q2(-1-(-2)) v1 42 53 5+ (q-1+q-q-11-q2) v1 43 52 5 = -q-1 v1 42 53 5. Since Hk ↠ TLk Ti-q ⟼ ei is a surjective homomorphism every TLk-module is an Hk-module.

The Bratelli diagram for the tower TL1⊆TL2⊆⋯ is ∅ = ∅ ∅ ∅

Lie algebras

A Lie algebra is a vector space 𝔤 with a bracket [,]:𝔤⊗𝔤→𝔤 such that

(a) [x,y]=-[y,x], for x,y∈𝔤,
(b) [x,[y,z]]=[[x,y],z]+[y,[x,z]], for x,y∈𝔤.

A Lie algebra is not an algebra.

The enveloping algebra of 𝔤 is the algebra U𝔤 generated by the vector space 𝔤 with relations yx=xy-[x,y], for x,y∈𝔤.

The Lie algebra 𝔰𝔩2 𝔰𝔩2 = {x∈M2(ℂ) | tr x=0} = {(abcd) | a+d=0} with [x,y]=xy-yx (product on the right is matrix multiplication).

The vector space 𝔰𝔩2 has basis e=(0100), f=(0010), h=(100-1) and [e,f]=h, [h,e]=2e, [h,f]=-2f. The enveloping algebra U𝔰𝔩2 is generated by e,f,h with relations ef=fe+h, eh=he-2e, hf=fh-2f. The algebra U𝔰𝔩2 has basis { fm1 hm2 em3  |  m1,m2,m3∈ℤ≥0 } . Note: U𝔰𝔩2 is not far from ℂ[ε,φ,η], the algebra generated by ε,φ,η with relations εφ=φε, εη=ηε, ηφ=φη.

U𝔰𝔩2 is a Hopf algebra

Let M,N be U-modules. M has basis {m1,…,mr} N has basis {n1,…,ns} The tensor product vector space is M⊗N with basis { mi⊗nj |  1≤i≤r,1≤j≤s } so that dim(M⊗N)=r·s. (Note M⊕N has basis {m1,…,mr,n1,…,ns} and dim(M⊕N)=r+s).

U is a Hopf algebra means that it comes with a map Δ:U⟶U⊗U, the coproduct, that tells me how to make U act on M⊗N.

For U=U𝔰𝔩2 this map is Δ(e) = e⊗1+1⊗e, Δ(f) = f⊗1+1⊗f, Δ(h) = h⊗1+1⊗h.

An 𝔰𝔩2-module is a U𝔰𝔩2-module.

Modules for U𝔰𝔩2

L(▫) has basis {v1,v-1} with U𝔰𝔩2 ⟶ End(L(▫)) e ⟼ (0100) f ⟼ (0010) h ⟼ (100-1). L(▫)⊗L(▫) has basis {v1⊗v1,v1⊗v-1,v-1⊗v1,v-1⊗v-1} and e(v1⊗v1) = 0 v0=f(v1⊗v1) = v-1⊗v1+r1 ⊗v-1 2v-2=fv0 = 2(v-1⊗v-1) ev0 = 2(v1⊗v1)=2v2 e(v2) = v0=v1⊗v1 e(v-1⊗v-1) = v-1⊗v1+ v1⊗v-1 ↑ e v2 f ⇵ e • v0 f ⇵ e • v-2 f ↓ hv2 = hv1⊗v1= v1⊗v1+ v1⊗v1= 2v1⊗v1 hv0 = 0 hv-2 = -2v-1⊗v-1 and v0=v1⊗v-1- v-1⊗v1 has ev0 = 0, fv0 = 0, hv0 = 0. So L(▫)⊗ L(▫)= L ( ) ⊕L(∅) where L ( )  has basis {v2,v0,v-2}, L(∅) has basis  {v}. L(∅)⊗L(▫) has basis {v0⊗v1,v0⊗v-1} e(v0⊗v1) = 0, f(v0⊗v1) = v0⊗v-1, h(v0⊗v1) = v0⊗v1, e(e0⊗v-1) = v0⊗v1, f(v0⊗v-1) = 0, h(v0⊗v-1) = -v0⊗v-1. So L(∅)⊗L(▫) ⟶∼ L(▫) v0⊗v1 ⟼ v1 v0⊗v-1 ⟼ v-1. Then L ( ) ⊗L(▫) has basis  { v2⊗v1,v2⊗v-1 v0⊗v1,v0⊗v-1 v-2⊗v1,v-2⊗v-1 } and e(v2⊗v1) = 0 v1=f(v2⊗v1) = v0⊗v1+v2⊗v-1 2v-1=f(v1) = v-2⊗v1+ v0⊗v-1+ v0⊗v-1 3v-3= fv-1 = v-2⊗v-1+ v-2⊗v-1+ v-2⊗v-1. ↑ e v3 =v2⊗v1 f ⇵ e v1 f ⇵ e v-1 f ⇵ e v-3 =v-2⊗v-1 f ↓ hv3 = 3v3 hv1 = v1 hv-1 = -v1 hv-3 = -3v3 and if v1 = v0⊗v1-2v2 ⊗v1 v-1 = 2v-2⊗v1+ v0⊗v-1 -2v0⊗v-1 = 2v-2⊗v1- v0⊗v-1 ↑ e v1 f ↓ v-1 f ↓ So L ( ) ⊗ L(▫)=L ( ) ⊕L(▫). In general L ( ⏞k ) ⊗L(▫)=L ( ⏞k+1 ) ⊕L ( ⏞k-1 ) and U𝔰𝔩2 ⟶ End ( L ( ⏞k ) ) e ⟼ ( 01 02 03 0 ⋱ 0k 0 ) f ⟼ ( 0 10 20 3⋱ 0 k0 ) h ⟼ ( k0 k-2 k-4 ⋱ -(k-4) -(k-2) 0-k ) The rule for -⊗L(▫) is given by ∅ ∅ ∅ So U𝔰𝔩2 should have something to do with TL1⊆TL2⊆⋯.

Notes and References

These are a typed copy of Lecture 4 from a series of handwritten lecture notes for the class Representation Theory given on August 19, 2008.

page history