The Heisenberg group

The Heisenberg group

Arun Ram
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
aram@unimelb.edu.au
and

Department of Mathematics
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Madison, WI 53706 USA
ram@math.wisc.edu

Last updates: 23 May 2010

The Heisenberg group

The Heisenberg group G= 1 x z 1 y 1 | x,y,z∈ℝ has the Lie algebra 𝔤= 0 x z 0 y 0 | x,y,z∈ℝ , where we exhibit 𝔤 as a Lie subalgebra of Mn ℝ since H is a subgroup of GL n ℝ . Setting X= 0 1 0 0 0 0 ,Y= 0 0 0 0 1 0 ,Z= 0 0 1 0 0 0 and 𝔥=span- XYZ with bracket determined by XY =Z, XZ =0, YZ =0.

Since 𝔤 𝔤𝔤 =0, the lower central series of 𝔤 is 𝔤⊇ 𝔤𝔤 ⊇0,where 𝔤𝔤 = 0 0 z 0 0 0 | z∈ℝ , is the center of 𝔤. The exponential map is given by 𝔤 → G 0 x z 0 y 0 ↦ 1 x z+xy/2 1 y 1 , since exp 0 x z 0 y 0 =1+ 0 x z 0 y 0 + 1 2 = 1 x z+xy/2 1 y 1 . Let X= 0 x z 0 y 0 ∈𝔤,g= eX= 1 x z+xy/2 1 y 1 ∈G,and  Y= 0 a c 0 b 0 ∈𝔤. Then Ad g Y=gY g -1 = 0 a c+bx 0 b 0 1 -x -z+xy/2 1 -y 1 = 0 a -ay+bx+c 0 b 0 describes the adjoint representation of G. (Alternatively one can use the formula Ad eX Y = e ad X Y to complete this calculation.)

To compute the coadjoint representation we need a good way of looking at 𝔤*=Hom 𝔤ℝ . Use the trace on Mn ℝ Tr: Mn ℝ → ℝ X ↦ Tr X to define a symmetric bilinear form ,: Mn ℝ × Mn ℝ by XY =Tr XY ,for  X,Y∈𝔤. The form , provides a vector space isomorphism Mn ℝ → Mn ℝ X ↦ X. where   X. : Mn ℝ → ℝ Y ↦ XY ,for   X∈ Mn ℝ . Use this isomorphism to identify Mn ℝ and Mn ℝ * . Our favourite basis of Mn ℝ is E ij | 1≤i,j≤n , where E ij denotes the matrix with a 1 in the ij -th entry and 0 everywhere else. Then E ij * = E ji | 1≤i,j≤n is the dual basis with respect to , . Since 𝔤=span- E 12 E 13 E 23 , 𝔤* =span- E 12 * E 13 * E23 * = 0 0 0 α 0 0 γ β 0 | α,β,γ∈ℝ . Let g= eX = 1 x z+xy/2 1 y 1 ∈G,φ= 0 0 0 α 0 0 γ β 0 ∈ 𝔤* ,Y= 0 a c 0 b 0 ∈𝔤. Then Ad g* Y = φ Ad g -1 Y =φ g -1 Yg = φ g -1 Yg = 0 0 0 α 0 0 γ β 0 0 a -ay+bx+c 0 b 0 = αa+βb+γay-γbx+c = 0 α+γy 0 γ β-γx 0 a c 0 b 0 . Thus Ad g* αβγ = α+γy β-γx γ , where we use the more concise notation αβγ for the matrix 0 α 0 γ β 0 ∈ 𝔤* . To compute the coadjoint orbits note that

  1. If γ≠0 then we can choose x,y∈ℝ so that Ad g* αβγ = 00γ . So 00γ is in the orbit of αβγ .
  2. If γ=0 then Ad g* αβγ = 00γ , for all g∈G. So αβ0 is in an orbit all by itself.
Thus there are two kinds of coadjoint orbits Ωγ = αβγ | α,β∈ℝ,γ∈ℝ\ 0 and Ω α,β = αβ0 | α,β∈ℝ , with dim Ωγ =2 and dim Ω α,β =0.

Note that dim𝔤=3 and 𝔥= 0 0 c 0 b 0 | b,c∈ℝ is a two dimensional subalgebra of 𝔤 such that , 𝔥𝔥 =0. So 𝔥 is a subalgebra of 𝔤 which is subordinate to any φ∈ 𝔤* , φ xy =φ 0 =0,for all  x,y∈𝔥. So, if φ∈ 𝔤* , then either a) there is a 3 dimensional subalgebra subordinate to φ (which must be all of 𝔤 ) or b) 𝔥 is a maximal subordinate subalgebra to φ.

  1. If φ= αβ0 = 0 α 0 0 β 0 ∈ Ω α,β then 𝔤 is subordinate to φ and G → ℂ* eX ↦ e 2πi φX is the representation V Ω α,β associated with the orbit Ω α,β . More precisely, V Ω α,β =span- v and 1 x z+xy/2 1 y 1 v= e 2πi αx+βy v v,for all  x,y,z∈ℝ, since φX = 0 α 0 0 β 0 0 x y 0 y 0 =αx+βy.
  2. If φ= αβγ = 0 α 0 0 β 0 ∈ Ωγ ,γ≠0, then 𝔤 is not subordinate to φ and so 𝔥 is a maximal subordinate subalgebra for φ. The one dimensional representation of H=exp 𝔥 is given by Wφ : H → ℂ* 1 0 z 1 y 1 ↦ e 2πi yβ+tz since exp 0 0 z 0 y 0 = 1 0 z 1 y 1 and 0 0 z 0 y 0 0 α 0 0 β 0 =yβ+γz. The representation of G corresponding to the orbit Ωγ is V Ωγ = Ind HG Wφ , and we can view elements of Ind HG Wφ as functions on H\G. Since H= 1 0 z 1 y 1 | y,z∈ℝ andG= 1 x z 1 y 1 | y,z∈ℝ , the elements 1 t 0 1 0 1 ,t∈ℝ, are coset representatives of the cosets in H\G. So we may view elements of V Ωγ as functions f: ℝ → ℂ= Wφ t ↦ f t . If X= 0 x z 0 y 0 then e X f t =f t eX =f 1 t 0 1 0 1 1 x z+xy/2 1 y 1 =f 1 0 a2 1 a 1 1 1 s 0 1 0 1 , where a1 =y,s=t+x and a2 =z+ xy /2+ty. So e X f t = f 1 x z+xy/2+ty 1 y 1 1 t+x 0 1 0 1 = 1 x z+xy/2+ty 1 y 1 f 1 t+x 0 1 0 1 = e 2πi yβ+γz+γ xy /2+γty f t+x , and this formula describes the action of G on V Ωγ .

Summary: For each orbit Ω α,β ,α,β∈ℝ, we get a one dimensional representation V Ω α,β =ℂv with action eX v= e 2πi αx+βy v,if  X= 0 x z 0 y 0 ∈𝔤, and for each orbit Ωγ ,γ≠0 we get an action of G on functions W Ωγ = f:ℝ→ℂ given by   eX f t = e 2πi yβ+γz+γ xy /2+γty f t+x .

Let us sho that the representations are irreducible by computing Hom G V Ωg V Ωγ = HomG Ind HG Wφ Ind HG Wφ ≅ T:G→Hom Wφ Wφ | T h1 g h 2 =T g .

Then T 1 x z 1 y 1 = T 1 0 z 1 y 1 1 x 0 1 0 1 = e 2πi βy+γz T x = T 1 x 0 1 0 1 1 0 z-xy 1 y 1 = e 2πi βy+γz-γxy T x . So T x =0 unless e 2πi -γxy =1 for all y∈ℝ. So T x =0 unless x=0. So T is determined by its value at thw identity matrix. So dim Hom G V Ωg V Ωg =1. So V Ωg is irreducible.

The following is an attempt to make this same argument work in general. (????? correct)

Let φ∈ 𝔤* and let 𝔥 be a maximal subalgebra of G subordinate to φ. Then (if Vφ is unitary) Vφ = Ind HG Wφ is irreducible.

Proof.
Let x be a coset representative for a coset in H\G. Let t:G→Hom Wφ Wφ be such that T h1 x h2 = h1 T x h2 ,for all   h1 , h2 ∈H. Let η∈𝔥. Then e 2πiφ η T x =T eη x =T x x -1 eη x =T x e Ad x -1 η =T x e 2πiφ Ad x -1 η . So T x =0 unless φ Ad x -1 η =φ η for all η∈𝔥. So T x =0 unless φ e ad -X η =φ η . So T x =0 unless φ e ad -X -1 η =0. Now ad -X =log 1+ e ad -X -1 = e ad -X -1 - e ad -X -1 2 2 +… So φ ad -X η =0 for all η∈𝔥. So φ - Xη =0 for all η∈𝔥. Let 𝔥~ =ℂX⊕𝔥. We know X∉𝔥 since x is a coset representative of H\G (not 1). Then h~ is a subalgebra of 𝔤 subordinate to φ. This is a contradiction to the maximality of 𝔥. So T x =0. So T x =0 unless x=1. So T is determined by its value at e0 =1. So dim Hom G VΩ VΩ =1. □

Remark 1. Let ℤ be the subgroup of G given by ℤ= 1 0 n 1 0 1 | n∈ℤ . The group G/ℤ is often called the Heisenberg group. This group has a subgroup S1 = 1 0 t 1 0 1 | t∈ℝ ≅ z∈ℂ| z =1 ≅ℝ/ℤ, which is contained in Z G/ℤ = G/ℤ G/ℤ , and this can be used to show that G/ℤ does not have a fithful finite dimensional representation. The Lie group G is the simply connected cover of G/ℤ. There is an exact sequence 1→ S1 →G/ℤ→1and if   ξη = ξ1 η2 - ξ 2 η1 , then G/ℤ= uexp ξ | u∈ S1 ,ξ∈ ℝ2 ,with  uexp ξ .vexp η =uv e i ξη exp ξ+η .

Let P,Q be such that PQ-QP=-i. Then e iaP e ibQ =- e iab e ibQ e iaP and G/ℤ is the group generated by e iaP and e ibQ . Let Ta , Mb and U c be the operators on L2 ℝ given by Ta f x =f x-a , Mb f= e 2πiλx f, U c f= e 2πiλc f,for fixed  λ∈ ℝ* . Then this is a unitary representation of G/ℤ for each λ and G/ℤ≅ Ta Mb Uc | a,b,c∈ℝ .

Remark 2. If P,Q are such that PQ-QP=-i and if a= 1 2 P+iQ and a* = 1 2 P-iQ ,then   a a* =1. Then, on L2 ℝ , a*   acts by   -i 2 d dx +x and a* Ω=0  for  Ω= e - 1 2 x2 . So Ω is a lowest weight vector and an Ω n≥0 is a basis of L2 ℝ . 𝔰 𝔩 2 ℝ ≅ Lie algebra generated by   i\2 P2 i\2 PQ+QP i\2 Q2 ⊆𝔤.

Remark 3. If P= 0 1 0 0 0 0 ,Q= 0 0 0 0 1 0 ,Z= 0 0 1 0 0 0 , then PQ =Z and these act on functions V Ωγ = f:ℝ→ℂ , via the differential of the representation V Ωγ of G. Then Zf t =2πiγf t . In particular, by considering the action of P,Q on V Ωγ when γ=-1/2π, we have operators P,Q on functions f:ℝ→ℂ which satisfy PQ =PQ-QP=-i. This solves a basic problem in QM, see Dirac and Heisenberg.

Remark 4. Define an action of SL 2 ℝ = a b c d | ad-bc=1 on 𝔤 by a b c d P=aP+cQ, a b c d Q=bP+dQ, a b c d Z=Z. Then a b c d P a b c d Q = aP+cQ bP+dQ =ad PQ +cb QP = ad-bc PQ = PQ , and so SL 2 ℝ acts on 𝔤 by automorphisms. Let m∈ SL 2 ℝ and let φ∈ 𝔤* . Let 𝔥 be subordinate to φ. The m𝔥 is subordinate to φ since m𝔥 is, after all, abelian. Then let us make the isomorphism Ind HG Wφ → Ind H~ G Wφ f ↦ f~ where H~ =exp m𝔥 …

References [PLACEHOLDER]

[BG] A. Braverman and D. Gaitsgory, Crystals via the affine Grassmanian, Duke Math. J. 107 no. 3, (2001), 561-575; arXiv:math/9909077v2, MR1828302 (2002e:20083)

page history