Bott Towers

Arun Ram
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
aram@unimelb.edu.au

Last update: 19 September 2012

Bott Towers

Let ℓ∈ℤ>0 and

letC= {cij} 1≤i<j≤ℓ ,withcij ∈ℤ.

The Bott tower Y is ( ℂ2- {(0,0)} ) ℓ = ( ℂ2- {(0,0)} ) ×…× ( ℂ2- {(0,0)} ) with the relation

[ z1,w1,… ,zℓ,wℓ ] = [ z1,w1,… ,zi-1, wi-1zit ,wit,zi+1 ,wi+1 tci,i+1,… ,zℓ,wℓ tci,ℓ,

for i=1,2,…,ℓ and t∈ℂ*. For S⊆{1,…,ℓ} let

YS= { [ z1,w1,… ,zℓ,wℓ ] ∣wi=0 ifi∉Sand wi∈ℂ×is i∈S } .

Then

Y= ⨆S⊆{1,…,N} YS,YS‾= ⨆T⊆SYT, andYS≅ ℂCard(S).

The torus D=(ℂ×)ℓ acts on Y by

(t1,tℓ) [ z1,w1,… ,zℓ,wℓ ] = [ z1,t1w1,… ,zℓ,tℓwℓ ] ,

and the D-fixed points in Y are

[S]= [σ1,…,σℓ] withσi= { (1,0) , ifi∉S , (0,1) , ifi∈S.

Let P1,…,Pn be the minimal parabolic subgroups Pi⊉B of G. Let ℓ∈ℤ>0 and let (i1,…,iℓ) be a sequence in {1,…,n} of length ℓ. The Bott-Samelson variety is

Γ=Pi1×B Pi2×B… ×BPiℓ/B,

so that Γ is Pi1×…Piℓ with the relations

[g1,…,gℓb] =[g1,…,gℓ] and [ g1,…,gi-1, gib,gi+1,… ,gℓ ] = [ g1,…,gi-1, gi,bgi+1,… ,gℓ ] ,

for b∈B and i=1,2,…,N-1. The torus T acts on Γ by

t[g1,…,gℓb]= [tg1,…,gℓb], fort∈T, [g1,…,gℓb] ∈Γ.

Since each component [zi,wi] of a point Y lives in ℙ1 and each component xij(cj)sj of a point of Γ lives in ℙ1,

Γ≅Ywherecjk = ⟨ αik, αij∨ ⟩ , for1≤j<k≤ℓ.

One must be quote careful at this step as this isomorphism is not an isomorphism in the algebraic category (THANKS TO DAVE ANDERSON FOR FLAGGING THIS). See [Wi1, Remark 2.10].

Furthermore the T action on Γ is the restriction of the D action on Y to T via the homomorphism

T ⟶ D t ⟼ ( Xαi1(t) ,…, Xαiℓ(t) ) .

There is a T–equivariant morphism

Γi1,…,iℓ =Pi1×B Pi2×B…×B Piℓ/B ⟶ γi1,…,iℓ Xw↪G/B ( xi1(c1) si1,…,xiℓ (cℓ)siℓB ) ⟼ xi1(c1) si1,…,xiℓ (cℓ)siℓB

where w=si1… siℓ.

The "Borel picture" for Y and Γ are

HD*(Y) ≅ ℂ [ y1,…,yℓ, x1,…,xℓ ] ⟨ xj2=yjxj -c1jx1 xj-…-cj-1,j xj-1xj,for j=1,…,ℓ ⟩ , HT*(Γ) ≅ ℂ [ α1,…,αn, x1,…,xℓ ] ⟨ xj2=αij xj- ⟨ αi1, αij∨ ⟩ x1xi-…- ⟨ αij-1, αij∨ ⟩ xj-1xj,for j=1,…,ℓ ⟩ .

The "moment graph picture" is given by Willems, who computes the map Φ=⨁S⊆{1,…,ℓ} ιS* and finds

ℂ [ y1,…,yℓ, x1,…,xℓ ] ⟨ xj2=yjxj -c1jx1 xj-…-cj-1,j xj-1xj,for j=1,…,ℓ ⟩ ⟶Φ ⨁S⊆{1,…,ℓ} ιS* ℂ [ y1,…,yℓ ]

is given by Φ(xj)S=0 if j∉S and

Φ(xj)S=yj+ ∑m∈ℤ>0 (-1)m+1 ∑ {i1,…,im,j} ⊆S ci1i2… cimjyi1, ifj∈S.

Willems also computes the map

γ*:HT(G/B) →HT(Γ) and findsγ* ([Xw])= ∑ S=(i1,…,ir) ⊆{1,…,ℓ} r=ℓ(w),w= si1…sir xi1…xir.

The favourite basis of HD(Y) is

σεD= ∏π+(ε) σ^iD=xi1 …xiℓ,if ε={i1,…,iℓ} .

FIX THIS LAST SENTENCE SO THAT IT MAKES SOME SENSE!!!

Example: Bott towers and Bott-Samelson varieties

The Bott tower Y for the data C= { c12, c13 c23 } has moment graph

{123} {12} {13} {23} {1} {2} {3} ∅ ε1 ε1 ε1 ε1 ε2 ε2 ε2-c12ε1 ε2-c12ε1 ε3 ε3-c23ε2 ε3-c13ε2 ε3-c13ε1-c23ε2+c12c23ε1

and the favourite basis for hD(Y) consists of the sections

Φ(x1)= yε1 yε1 yε1 0 yε1 0 0 0 Φ(x2)= yε2-c12ε1 yε2-c12ε1 0 yε2 0 yε2 0 0 Φ(x3)= y ε2-c13 ε1-c23 ε2+c12 c23ε1 0 yε3-c13ε1 yε3-c23ε2 0 0 yε3 0 Φ(x1x2)= yε1 yε2-c12ε1 yε1 yε2-c12ε1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Φ(x2x3)= yε2-c12ε1 y ε2-c13ε1 -c23ε2+ c12c23ε1 0 0 yε2 yε3-c23ε2 0 0 0 0 Φ(x1x3)= yε1 y ε2-c13ε1 -c23ε2+ c12c23ε1 0 yε1 yε3-c13ε1 0 0 0 0 0 Φ(x1x2x3)= yε1 yε2-c12ε1 y ε2-c13ε1 -c23ε2+ c12c23ε1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

which provide the relations

x12 = yε1x1, x22 = yε2x2+ yε2-c12ε1 -yε2 yε1 x1x2, x32 = yε3x3+ yε3-c23ε2 -yε3 yε2 x2x3+ yε3-c13ε1 -yε3 yε1 x1x3 + yε2 yε2-c12ε1 + yε2-c12ε1 yε3-c23ε2 - yε2-c12ε1 yε3 - y ε2-c13ε1- c23ε2+ c12c23ε1 yε2 yε1 yε2 yε2-c12ε1 x1x2x3.

In particular, the "Borel picture" in cohomology is

HD(Y)= ℂ [ y1,y2,y3, x1,x2,x3 ] ⟨ x12 = y1x1, x22 = y2x2-c12 x1x2, x32 = y3x3-c23 x2x3-c13 x1x3 ⟩

Now consider the Bott-Samelson variety Γ=P1×BP2 ×BP1/B for G=SL3 for which

C= { c12=-1, c13=2 c23=-1 } since ⟨α1,α2∨⟩ =-1, ⟨α1,α1∨⟩ =2, ⟨α2,α1∨⟩ =-1.

The "Borel picture" in cohomology is

HT(Γ)= ℂ [ α1,α2,α3, x1,x2,x3 ] ⟨ x12 = α1x1, x22 = α2x2+ x1x2, x32 = α3x3+ x2x3+2 x1x3 ⟩

since y1=y-α1, y2=y-α2, y3=y-α3. In terms of moment graphs, the inclusion γ*:HT (G/B)⟶HT (Γ) is given by

f1 fs2 fs1 fs1s2 fs1s2 fs1s2s1 y-α2 y-(α1+α2) y-(α1+α2) y-α1 y-α1 y-(α1+α2) y-α2 y-α2 y-α1 f1 fs2 w0fs1s2s1 fs1 fs1s2 fs2s1 fs1s2 fs1s2s1 y1 y-α1 y-α1 y-α1 y-α2 y-α2 y-α1 y-(α1+α2) y-α1 y-s2α1 y-s1α1 y-α2

Then

γ*: HT(G/B) ⟶ HT(Γ) [Xs1s2s1] ⟼ 1 [Xs1s2] ⟼ x1+x3 [Xs2s1] ⟼ x2 [Xs1] ⟼ x1x2 [Xs2] ⟼ x2x3 [X1] ⟼ x1x2x3

and the composite

HT(G/B) ⟶γ*HT (Γ)⟶Φ ⨁S⊆{1,2,3} HT(pt)= ⨁S⊆{1,2,3} ℂ[yα1,yα2]

has

Φ(x1)= y-α1 y-α1 y-α1 0 y-α1 0 0 0 Φ(x2)= y-(α1+α2) y-(α1+α2) 0 y-α2 0 y-α2 0 0 = y-s1α2 y-s1α2 0 y-α2 0 y-α2 0 0 Φ(x3)= y-α2 0 yα1 y-(α1+α2) 0 0 y-α1 0 = y-s1s2α2 0 y-s1α1 y-s2α1 0 0 y-α1 0

giving

Φ ( γ*[Xs1s2] ) =Φ(x1+x3)= y-(α1+α2) y-α1 0 y-(α1+α2) y-α1 0 y-α1 0 Φ ( γ*[Xs2s1] ) =Φ(x2)= y-(α1+α2) y-(α1+α2) 0 y-α2 0 y-α2 0 0 Φ ( γ*[Xs1] ) =Φ(x1x2)= y-α1y-(α1+α2) y-α1y-(α1+α2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Φ ( γ*[Xs2] ) =Φ(x2x3)= y-α2y-(α1+α2) 0 0 y-α2y-(α1+α2) 0 0 0 0 Φ ( γ*[X1] ) =Φ(x1x2x3)= y-α1y-α2y-(α1+α2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

page history