Representation Theory, Reflection groups and Groups of Lie Type

Arun Ram
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
aram@unimelb.edu.au

Last update: 8 October 2012

Representation Theory

An algebra is a vector space with a product so that A is a ring.

Representation theory is the study of the category of A-modules (vector spaces M with an action of A).

A simple A-module is an A-module M with no submodules, except D and M.

Problem: Determine the simple A-modules.

An indecomposable module is an A-module M such that there DOES NOT EXIST N and P nonzero submodules with M=N⊕P.

N P N P M=N⊕P 0⟶P⟶M⟶N⟶0 butM≠N⊕P

Reflection groups

Let Z be a subring of ℂ.

A reflection group is a pair (𝔥Z,W0) with

  1. 𝔥Z a free Z-module
  2. W0 a finite subgroup of GL(𝔥Z) generated by reflections.

A reflection is an element s∈GLn(ℂ) conjugate to

( ξ0 1 ⋱ 01 ) withξ≠1.

A crystallographic reflection group is a ℤ-reflection group.

A Euclidean reflection group is an ℝ-reflection group.

Examples

Type SL3: 𝔥ℤ=ℤ-span{α1,α2}

W0= ⟨ s1s2∣ si2=1,s1 s2s1=s2s1 s2 ⟩ 𝔥α1∨ 𝔥α2∨ 𝔥α3∨ s1 s2 α2 α1 s1s2 s2s1 s1s2s1=s2s1s2 C0

Type GLn: 𝔥ℤ=ℤε1 +…+ℤεn.

W0=Snpermuting ε1,…,εn

Reflections in Sn:

sij= 1 ˙ ˙ ˙ i ˙ ˙ ˙ j ˙ ˙ ˙ n for1≤i<j≤n. C0= { λ=λ1ε1+…+ λnεn∣ λi∈ℝ,λ1 ≥…≥λn }

Coxeter's theorem Let (𝔥ℝ,W0) be a Euclidean refelction group. Let C0 be a fundamental region for W0 acting on 𝔥ℝ. Let

𝔥α1∨,…, 𝔥αn∨ be the walls ofC0 s1,…,sn the corresponding reflections

Then W0 is presented by generators s1,…,sn with reflections

si2=1and sisjsi…⏟mijfactors= sjsisj…⏟mijfactors fori≠j

where πmij= 𝔥αi∨∡ 𝔥αj∨.

Groups of Lie Type

Type GLn GLn(ℂ) is generated by

xij(c)= ( 1 c ⋱ 1 ) ,xji(c)= i j ( 1 ⋱ c 1 ) hλ(t)= ( tλ1 0 ⋱ 0 tλn ) for 1≤i<j≤n,c∈ℂ, λ=λ1ε1+…+ λnεn∈𝔥ℤ, t∈ℂ×

with relations

xij(c1) xij(c2)= xij(c1+c2) ,… wxij(c)w-1 =xw(i)w(j) (c),whλ (t)w-1=hwλ (t) and more...

Type SL3 SL3(𝔽) is generated by

xα1∨(c)= ( 1c 1 1 ) xα2∨(c)= ( 1 1c 1 ) xα3∨(c)= ( 1c 1 1 ) x-α1∨(c)= ( 1 c1 1 ) x-α2∨(c)= ( 1 1 c1 ) x-α3∨(c)= ( 1 1 c1 ) hα1(t)= ( t t-1 1 ) hα2(t)= ( 1 t t-1 )

with relations

xα1∨(c1) xα1∨(c2)= xα1∨(c1+c2), hα1(t1) hα1(t2)= hα1(t1t2), etc.

(Chevalley-Steinberg-Tits) Let (𝔥ℤ,W0) be a crystallographic reflection group.

R+ an index set for the reflections in W0.

Define G by generators

xα(c), x-α(c)and hλ(t), for α∈R+,c∈ℂ λ∈𝔥ℤ,t∈ℂ×

with relations

xα(c1) xα(c2)= xα(c1+c2), hλ(t1) hλ(t2)= hλ(t1t2), hλ(t)hμ(t)= hλ+μ(t), and more.

Then

{ ℤ-reflection groups (𝔥ℤ,W0) } ⟷ { complex reductive algebraic groups }

is an equivalence of categories

Other equivalences

{ complex reductive algebraic groups } ⟷ { compact Lie groups } { connected, simply connected, compact Lie groups } ⟷ { complex semisimple Lie algebras }

Anderson-Grodal et al have proved:

There is an equivalence of categories:

{ℤq-reflection groups} ⟶ {p-compact groups} (𝔥ℤq,W0) ⟼ BG

Notes and References

These are a typed version of lecture notes for the first in a series of lectures given at the Brazil Algebra Conference, Salvador, 16 July 2012.

page history