Unipotent Hecke algebras: the structure, representation theory, and combinatorics
Arun Ram
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
aram@unimelb.edu.au
Last updated: 26 March 2015
This is an excerpt of the PhD thesis Unipotent Hecke algebras: the structure, representation theory, and combinatorics by F. Nathaniel Edgar Thiem.
The representation theory of the Yokonuma algebra
General type
Let be the trivial character, and let
be the idempotent so that
Then the Yokonuma algebra
has a basis
where
and
Recall that
The map
is an injective algebra homomorphism (see Chapter 3 (E3)). For write
(Yokonuma). is generated by
and with relations
Proof.
Consider the product for
Note that
Thus, if
decomposes according to
(see (3.4)), then
The Yokonuma algebra is therefore generated by
and
The necessity of the relations is a direct consequence of (6.2), (N3), (UN3), and (N2) (the last three are from Chapter 3). For sufficiency, use a similar argument
to the one used in the proof of Theorem 3.5 in [IMa1965].
A reduction theorem
Let index the irreducible Since
is abelian, all the irreducible modules are one-dimensional, and we may identify the label
of
with the homomorphism given by
Suppose is an As a
Note that
Recall the surjection of (3.3). Use this map to identify
Thus, the on
implies that for
Thus,
Let
and
Remarks1.
Since the identity of is
and the identity of is
the algebra is not a subalgebra of
In fact,
2.
If is an then
In particular, is an
Let be an irreducible
such that Then
(a)
is an irreducible
(b)
if is an irreducible
then
is an irreducible
(c)
the map
is an isomorphism.
Proof.
(a) Let
The irreducibility of implies that
so for any there exist elements
such that
Since an arbitrarily chosen is contained in
we have
making an irreducible
(b) Suppose is an irreducible Let
where the last equality follows from
Note that
In particular, is an irreducible
and
Suppose has a nontrivial
Since is induced from
there must by some such that
But is an
so As an
irreducible
and by the construction of
Therefore, contains no nontrivial, proper submodules, making an irreducible
(c) Follows from the proof of (b).
Let be the set of
in Identify
with a set of orbit representatives, and for
let index the irreducible modules of
The map
is a bijection.
The algebras
Let be a Borel subgroup of Since
is a surjective homomorphism,
extends to a linear character of given by
Note that
Thus,
where if is the trivial character then
is the Iwahori-Hecke algebra.
Let be such that
is generated by simple reflections. Then is presented by generators
with relations
Proof.
This follows from Theorem 6.1 and
The case
The Yokonuma algebra and the Iwahori-Hecke algebra
If is the trivial character of
then Let
and recall that
In the case
has generators
for
and
with relations
The Yokonuma algebra has a decomposition
Fix a total ordering on the set
of linear characters of such that
is the trivial character. Suppose Since
Thus, every can be written
Let
with Write
Note that the are orbit representatives of the
in Let
Note that is generated by its simple reflections.
If is in the factor of
then write
Let and
for Then
is presented by generators
with relations
Proof.
Note that if then
Thus, the lemma follows from the Yokonuma algebra relations.
The Iwahori-Hecke algebra is the algebra
In write
Let
Index the generators of by
Then the map
is an algebra isomorphism.
Proof.
Let
Then the map
is an algebra isomorphism by Lemma 6.5. Corollary 6.6 follows by applying this map to tensor products.
The representation theory of
By Corollary 6.6, understanding the representation theory of is the same as understanding the representation
theory of the Iwahori-Hecke algebras
Let be a partition. A standard tableau of shape is a column strict tableau
of shape and weight (i.e. every number between from
to appears exactly once). Suppose is a standard tableau of shape
Let
([Hoe1974, Ram1997, Wen1988]). Let
Then
(a)
The irreducible
are indexed by partitions
(b)(c)
Let
Then
where if
is not a column strict tableau.
Recall from Chapter 5, an
is a sequence of partitions indexed by Let
Let
with as in (6.7). A
standard
of shape is a column strict filling of by the numbers
such that
(a)
each number appears exactly once,
(b)
if
Let
Example. If
then
The set is
and, for example,
Let
Suppose so that
Write
Let
with and
Then
(a)
The irreducible
are indexed by
(b)(c)
Let
Then
where if
is not a column strict tableau.
Proof.
Transfer the explicit action of Theorem 6.7 across the isomorphism
of Corollary 6.6.
The irreducible modules of
The goal of this section is to construct the irreducible
According to Corollary 6.3 and (6.7), the map
is a bijection.
Let be the set of minimal length coset representatives of
Then
Note that the map
is a bijection (since implies preserves the relative
magnitudes of the entries in for all
For example, under this bijection
(since in
on the left side, in
on the right side). Write
If then let
Remarks.1.
In the notation of Chapter 5,
2.
The map
is a bijection, so by (6.14), indexes the irreducible
Suppose is a tableau of shape and weight
As in (6.11)-(6.13), if has the box containing then write
(a)
The irreducible
are indexed by
(b)(c)
Let
as in (6.15) and (6.17). Then
where if
is not a column strict tableau.
Proof.
(a) follows from Remark 2, and (b) follows from (6.15) and (6.17).)
(c) Directly compute the action of on
For if
then
Since
can hold only if
the orthogonality of characters implies
If
then there are two cases:
Case 1:
for some
Case 2:
for all
In Case 1,
In Case 2,
Make the identification of (6.16) in equations (6.19), (6.20), and (6.21) to obtain the
on
Sample Computations. If for then
A Character Table for
Notes and References
This is an excerpt of the PhD thesis Unipotent Hecke algebras: the structure, representation theory, and combinatorics by F. Nathaniel Edgar Thiem.