Last updates: 31 May 2011
and , |
Note that (a), (b), (c) and (d) in the definition of a ring mean that is an abelian group under addition. The definition of a ring is motivated by the properties of the integers.
HW: Show that the additive identity is unique.
HW: Show that if then its additive inverse
is unique.
HW: Show that the identity is unique.
HW: Show that if then .
HW: Show that if and is the identity in then
.
Important examples of rings are:
Ring homomorphisms are for comparing rings.
Let and be rings with identities and , respectively.
Two rings are isomorphic if the elements of the rings and their operations match up exactly.
Think of rings that are isomorphic as being "the same".
HW: Give an example of two rings and that are isomorphic
as groups but not as rings.
In the case of group, condition (b) in the definition of ring homomorphism forced condition (c). (See
Proposition 1.1.11). This does not happen here since rings don't necessarily have multiplicative inverses.
Let be a ring homomorphism. Let and be the zeros for and respectively. Then
Let be a ring and let be an additive subgroup of . We will use the subgroup to divide up the ring .
Let be a ring and let be an additive subgroup of . Then the cosets of in partition .
Notice that the proofs of Proposition (rgptn) and Proposition
(gpptn) are essentially the same.
HW: Write a very short proof of Proposition (rgptn) by using (gpptn).
Let be a ring and let be an additive subgroup of . We can try to make the set of cosets of in into a ring by defining an addition operation and a multiplication operation on cosets. The only problem is that this doesn't work for the cosets of just any additive subgroup, the subgroup has to have special properties.
HW: Let be a ring and let be an additive subgroup of . Show that is a normal subgroup of .
HW: Show that if is an ideal of a ring then
and if
then .
HW: Show that an ideal of a ring is an additive subgroup of
.
Let be an additive subgroup of a ring . Then is an ideal of if and only if with operations given by is a ring.
Notice that the proofs of Proposition 2.1.6 and proposition 1.1.8 are essentially the same.
HW: Write a shorter proof of Proposition 2.1.6 by using Proposition 1.1.8.
So we have successfully made into a ring when is an ideal of .
Note that not . If was then would not necessarily be a subgroup of (not to mention an ideal) and we couldn't even hope to get homomorphism theorems like we did for groups.
Let be a ring homomorphism. Then
Let be a ring homomorphism. Let be the zero element of . Then
Notice that the proof of Proposition (rginjsur)(b) does not use the fact that is a homomorphism, only the fact that is a function.
Suppose and are rings. The idea is to make into a ring.
HW: Show that these are good definitions, i.e. that, as defined above, and are rings with zeros given by and , respectively, and identities given by and , respectively.
HW: Give an example of a noncommutative ring.
HW:Prove that is a subring of .
HW: Give an example to show that is not
necessarily an ideal of .
HW: What two elements are always in the center of ?
Let be a ring. Let and be the zero and the identity in , respectively.
HW: Show that if then in .
HW: Show that if has both a left inverse and a right
inverse then they must be equal.
HW: Give an example of a ring and an element of that has a left
inverse but not a right inverse.
HW: What element of a ring is always a unit?
HW: Give an example of a ring such that .
The ideal is the smallest ideal of containing . Think of as gotten by adding to exactly those elements of that are needed to make an ideal.
HW: Show that a proper ideal does not contain any units.
Every proper ideal of a ring is contained in a maximal ideal of .
These notes are written to highlight the analogy between groups and group actions, rings and modules, and fields and vector spaces.
[Ram] A. Ram, Notes in abstract algebra, University of Wisconsin, Madison 1993-1994.
[Bou] N. Bourbaki, Algèbre, Chapitre 9: Formes sesquilinéaires et formes quadratiques, Actualités Sci. Ind. no. 1272 Hermann, Paris, 1959, 211 pp. MR0107661.
[Ru] W. Rudin, Real and complex analysis, Third edition, McGraw-Hill, 1987. MR0924157.