Relations

Arun Ram
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
aram@unimelb.edu.au

Last updates: 1 July 2011

Definitions

Let S be a set.

Examples. Let S be the set {1,2,6}.

(a)   R1 = { (1,1), (2,6), (6,1) } is a relation on S.
(b)   R1 is not reflexive, not symmetric and not transitive.
(c)   R2 = { (1,1), (2,6), (6,1), (2,1) } is a relation on S.
(d)   R2 is transitive but not reflexive and not symmetric.

Let S be a set.

(a)   Let S be a set and let ∼ be an equivalence relation on S.
(a)   Then the set of equivalence classes of the relation ∼ is a partition of S.
(b)   Let S be a set and let {Sα} be a partition of S.
(b)   Then the relation defined by s∼t if s and t are in the same Sα is an equivalence relation on S.

Proposition (eqrelptn) shows that the concepts of an equivalence relation on S and of a partition on S are essentially the same. Each equivalence relation on S determines a partition and vice versa.

Example. Let S={1,2,3, …,10}. Let ∼ be the equivalence relation determined by

1∼5, 2∼3, 9∼10,
1∼7, 5∼8, 10∼4,
Since we are requiring that ∼ is an equivalence relation, we are assuming that we have all the other relations we need such that ∼ is reflexive, symmetric and transitive;
1∼1, 2∼2, … 9∼9, 10∼10,
5∼7, 7∼8, 7∼5, 5∼1, …
The equivalence classes are given by [1] =[5]=[7] =[8] = {1,5,7,8}, [2]=[3] = {2,3}, [6] = {6},and [4]=[9]= [10] = {4,9,10}, and the sets S1 ={1,5,7,8}, S2 ={2,3}, S3 = {6}, and S4 = {4,9,10} form a partition of S.

Notes and References

These notes are an updated version of notes of Arun Ram from 1994.

References

[Ram] A. Ram, Notes in abstract algebra, University of Wisconsin, Madison 1993-1994.

[Bou] N. Bourbaki, Algèbre, Chapitre 9: Formes sesquilinéaires et formes quadratiques, Actualités Sci. Ind. no. 1272 Hermann, Paris, 1959, 211 pp. MR0107661.

[Ru] W. Rudin, Real and complex analysis, Third edition, McGraw-Hill, 1987. MR0924157.

page history