Lusztig-Nakajima variety notes from March 2002

Arun Ram
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
aram@unimelb.edu.au

Last update: 3 September 2013

Lusztig-Nakajima variety notes from March 2002

Let v=∑i∈Iviki and λ=∑i∈Iλiωi be the elements of Q+=∑i∈I ℤ≥0αi andP+= ∑i∈I ℤ≥0ωi, respectively. Fix I-graded vector spaces V and W with dim(Vi)=vi anddim(Wi)= λi.

Define Ev,w = ⨁τ∈Ω± Hom(Vout(τ),Vin(τ)) ⊕ ( ⨁i∈I Hom(Vi,Wi)⊕ Hom(Wi,Vi) ) 𝔤𝔩V = ⨁i∈I𝔤𝔩(Vi) and define the moment map μ:EV,W→𝔤𝔩V by μ(x+φ+ψ)i= ∑τ∈Ω+out(τ)=i xτ‾xτ- ∑τ∈Ω+in(τ)=i xτxτ‾+ ∑i∈Iψiφi.

A point (x+φ+ψ)∈μ-1(0) is stable if {x-stable S⊆ker φ} ={0}. Pictorially, xW1W1 xW2W1 xW3W1 xW4W1 xW5W1 ψ1⇵φ1 ψ2⇵φ2 ψ3⇵φ3 ψ4⇵φ4 ψ5⇵φ5 0V1V1 ⇆ 0V2 ⇆ 0V3V1 ⇆ 0V4 ⇆ 0V5 ⇵ 0V6V1 ψ6⇵φ6 xW6W1

Let GLV=∏i∈IGL(Vi) and define 𝔪(λ)= ⨆v∈Q+𝔪 (v,λ),where  𝔪(v,λ)= μ-1(0)sGLV is the set of GLV-orbits of stable points in μ-1(0).

Define 𝔪0(v,λ)= μ-1(0)sGLV to be the affine variety with coordinate ring given by the space of GLV-invariant polynomials on μ-1(0). Use the map π: 𝔪(v,λ) ⟶ 𝔪0(v,λ) [x+φ+ψ] ⟼ the unique closed orbit in  GLV·(x+φ+ψ)‾ to define ℒ(v,λ)= π-1(0) and ℒ(λ)= ⨆v∈Q+ ℒ(v,λ). Let λ(1),λ(2)∈P+ be such that λ(1)+ λ(2)=λ, and fix a decomposition of W=W(1)⊕W(2) so that dim(Wi(1))=λi(1) and dim(Wi(2))=λi(2). Let GLW(1)= ∏i∈IGL (Wi(1)) and GL(W(2))= ∏i∈I GL(Wi(2)) and define a one parameter subgroup of GL(W) by λ: ℂ* ⟶ GL(W) t ⟼ idW(1)⊕ tidW(2). Define 𝔷∼(λ(1),λ(2)) = { [x+φ+ψ]∈𝔪 (λ) |  (limt→0λ(t)) (x+φ+ψ)∈ℒ (λ(1))× ℒ(λ(2)) } = { [x+φ+ψ]∈𝔪(λ)  | limt→0 ( λ(t)π (x+φ+ψ) ) =0 } . Let U be the I-graded vector space given by Ui=Wi⊕ ( ⨁(ji)∈Ω± Vj ) and form V⟶σU ⟶τV, where σi= (⨁in(τ)=ixτ‾) +φiand τi=∑in(τ)=τ xτ-∑out(τ)=i xτ‾+ψi. Let b∈Irr(𝔷∼) and define εi(b) = dim(Viim τi) φi(b) = dim(ker τiim σi) wt(b) = λ-v,for b∈ Irr(𝔷∼∩𝔪(v,λ)) where the sequence (*) is taken with respect to a generic point [x+φ+ψ]∈b.

Let bx+φ+ψ denote the irreducible component of a point [x+φ+ψ]∈𝔪(v,λ). Define 𝔪i,ℓ(v,λ)= { [x+φ+λ]∈ 𝔪(v,λ) |  εi(bx+φ+ψ) =ℓ } and consider the maps 𝔪i,εi(b) (v,λ) ⟶p 𝔪i,0 (v-εi(b)αi,λ) ⟵p′ 𝔪i,εi(b)-1 (v-αi,λ) ↖ p′′ p′′ 𝔪i,εi(b)+1 (v+αi,λ) where p′ exists if εi(b)>0 and p′′ exists if φi(b)>0.

Then define e∼i(b)= { p+-1 ( p ( b∩𝔪i,εi(b) (v,λ) ) ) ‾ , if εi(b)>0, 0, otherwise, and f∼i(b)= { p--1 ( p ( b∩𝔪i,εi(b) (v,λ) ) ) ‾ , if φi(b)>0, 0, otherwise.

(a) Irr(𝔷∼) with wt,εi,φi,e∼i,f∼i is a crystal which is isomorphic to B(λ(1))⊗B(λ(2)).
(b) The subset Irr(ℒ(λ))⊆Irr(𝔷∼) is a subcrystal isomorphic to B(λ).

References

[Nak2002] H. Nakajima, Quiver varieties and tensor products, arXiv:math/0103008v2 [math.QA]

[Nak1998] H. Nakajima, Quiver varieties and Kac-Moody algebras, Duke Math, J. 91 No. 3 (1998), 515-560.

[Lus1990-3] G. Lusztig, Canonical bases arising from quantized enveloping algebras II, Common Trends in Mathematics and quantum field theories (T. Eguchi et. al. eds) Progr. Theoret. Phys. Suppl., 102 (1990), pp. 175–201

[KSa1997-2] M. Kashiwara and Y. Saito, Geometric constructions of crystal bases, Duke Math. 89 (1997), 9-36. arXiv:q-alg/9606009

[Sai2000] Y. Saito, Geometric construction of crystal bases II, preprint 2000, arXiv:math/0111232v1 [math.QA]

page history